


Why Does `std::array` Require Double Curly Braces in Initializer Lists?
Nov 08, 2024 am 05:07 AMInitializer List Behavior: Differences in std::vector and std::array
While std::vector and std::array are both containers in C , their behavior with initializer lists differs. In this article, we'll explore the intricacies of aggregate initialization and understand why double curly braces are required for std::array.
Consider the following code snippet that initializes a std::vector and a std::array:
std::vector<int> x{1,2,3,4}; std::array<int, 4> y{{1,2,3,4}};
std::vector Initialization
std::vector supports user-defined constructors, including those that accept a std::initializer_list. Therefore, we can directly initialize x using braces without the need for extra curly braces.
std::array Initialization
Unlike std::vector, std::array is an aggregate that doesn't have user-defined constructors. Instead, it relies on aggregate initialization, a feature inherited from C.
In "old style" aggregate initialization, the equal sign and colons are used:
std::array<int, 4> y = { { 1, 2, 3, 4 } };
However, when using direct list initialization (introduced in C 11), this = syntax is no longer valid. Additionally, brace elision, which allows omitting extra braces, is only permitted in declarations with the old style = syntax. For direct list initialization, extra braces are mandatory.
CWG Defect
A CWG defect report (CWG defect #1270) aims to resolve this restriction by allowing brace elision for other forms of list initialization. If adopted, the following code would be well-formed:
std::array<int, 4> y{ 1, 2, 3, 4 };
In conclusion, the difference in behavior between std::vector and std::array with initializer lists stems from their fundamental characteristics as a class with user-defined constructors and an aggregate relying on aggregate initialization, respectively. Double curly braces are required for std::array to conform to the rules of aggregate initialization, while std::vector allows for direct initialization using a single set of braces without relying on old-style aggregate initialization syntax.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does `std::array` Require Double Curly Braces in Initializer Lists?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
