std::list::sort(): Why the Shift to a Top-Down Merge Sort?
Oct 30, 2024 pm 04:07 PMstd::list<>::sort(): Why the Sudden Switch to Top-Down Strategy?
The switch from a bottom-up to a top-down merge sort in std::list<>::sort() arose to address the need for more robust and exception-safe sorting. The previous implementation used an array of internal lists, but this could encounter issues due to the introduction of non-default-constructible and stateful allocators in VS2015.
To circumvent this, Microsoft's Stephan T. Lavavej suggested using iterators to keep track of run boundaries within the original linked list. This allows for the use of std::list::splice to move nodes within the list during merge operations, ensuring exception safety. While this change improves robustness, it does incur a performance cost, as scanning through a linked list to find the midpoint can be inefficient.
However, in the Visual Studio 2022 update, Microsoft enhanced the top-down implementation by switching to a more efficient recursive strategy where integer sizes are simply halved rather than iterating through the list. This modification preserves the benefits of exception safety and avoids the performance penalty of repeated calls to std::next.
As an alternative to the top-down approach, some developers have proposed using a bottom-up merge sort with iterators, as introduced earlier in this document. This approach also uses iterators but operates in a bottom-up fashion, eliminating the need to scan through the list to find the midpoint. The specific implementation depends on the size of the list and the distribution of nodes, with trade-offs between time and space complexity.
While the top-down merge sort remains the default in std::list<>::sort(), the modified implementation in VS2022 aims to provide a balance of efficiency and exception safety. Developers may explore alternative implementations, such as bottom-up merge sort with iterators, depending on the specific requirements of their application.
The above is the detailed content of std::list::sort(): Why the Shift to a Top-Down Merge Sort?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
