Procedural Impairment: Avoiding std::enable_if in Function Signatures
Scott Meyers' upcoming book, EC 11, advises avoiding std::enable_if in function signatures. Despite its versatility in conditionally removing functions or classes from overload resolution, certain limitations and readability issues warrant reconsideration of its usage.
Methods of Employing std::enable_if in Function Signatures
Function Parameter:
<code class="cpp">template<typename T> struct Check1 { template<typename U = T> U read(typename std::enable_if< // Option 1: As function parameter std::is_same<U, int>::value >::type* = 0) { return 42; } };</code>
Template Parameter:
<code class="cpp">template<typename T> struct Check2 { template<typename U = T, typename std::enable_if< // Option 2: As template parameter std::is_same<U, int>::value, int >::type = 0> U read() { return 42; } };</code>
Return Type:
<code class="cpp">template<typename T> struct Check3 { template<typename U = T> typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<U, int>::value, U>::type read() { // Option 3: As return type return 42; } };</code>
Recommended Approach: Placement in Template Parameters
The optimal solution involves placing the enable_if in the template parameters. This approach offers several advantages:
Readability Enhancement:
The enable_if usage is separated from return/argument types, improving clarity and reducing clutter.
Universal Applicability:
Unlike the other options, the template parameter placement is applicable to constructors and operators without additional arguments.
Return Type Exclusion:
While "Avoid std::enable_if in function signatures" primarily addresses its use in normal function signatures, it does apply to return types in template specializations. The concern stems from readability issues when merging enable_if with return types.
Member vs. Non-Member Functions:
The principle holds true for both member and non-member function templates.
The above is the detailed content of Should You Avoid `std::enable_if` in Function Signatures?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
