


Can You Assign to Rvalue References of Class Type? A Paradox Explained.
Nov 01, 2024 pm 05:44 PMAssigning to Rvalue References of Class Type: A Paradox Resolved
In the realm of C , the distinction between lvalues and rvalues is paramount. Lvalues represent objects with memory locations that can be modified, while rvalues embody temporary objects or constants that cannot. However, an intriguing code snippet raises questions about this fundamental divide:
<code class="cpp">class Y { public: explicit Y(size_t num = 0) {} }; int main() { Y(1) = Y(0); // Here lies the enigma! return 0; }</code>
Why does this code compile? Isn't the rvalue returned by the constructor ephemeral and thus unfit for assignment?
The key to understanding this paradox lies in the implicit assignment operator in C . When the assignment operator is not explicitly defined for a class, the compiler synthesizes a default assignment operator. Crucially, this synthesized operator can be applicable to rvalues in some cases.
This is where the explicit keyword plays a role. In the given example, the Y class does not declare an assignment operator, so the compiler generates one. The explicit keyword prevents implicit conversions from rvalues, but it does not prevent the synthesized assignment operator from being applicable to rvalues.
Thus, in our code, the synthesized assignment operator:
<code class="cpp">Y& Y::operator=(Y const&);</code>
or
<code class="cpp">Y& Y::operator=(Y&);</code>
can be invoked with the rvalue Y(1) on the left-hand side. This allows the assignment to proceed, even though Y(1) is an rvalue.
To prevent assignment to temporary objects, one can explicitly declare the assignment operator with a ref-qualifier (&):
<code class="cpp">class Y { public: explicit Y(std::size_t num = 0); Y& operator=(Y const&) & = default; };</code>
In this case, the assignment operator will not be synthesized, and attempting to assign to an rvalue will result in a compilation error.
The above is the detailed content of Can You Assign to Rvalue References of Class Type? A Paradox Explained.. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
