


What Happens When You Shift Right with a Count Exceeding Type Width in C ?
Nov 03, 2024 am 02:40 AMShifting Right with Count Exceeding Type Width: Undefined Behavior
In C , the right shift operator (>>) performs logical or arithmetic shift operations on integers. While the behavior of this operator is generally well-defined, there are certain conditions that can lead to undefined behavior.
One such condition is when the shift count exceeds the width of the type being shifted. The C standard explicitly states that "The behavior is undefined if the right operand is negative, or greater than or equal to the length in bits of the promoted left operand."
This implies that shifting an integer by a count greater than or equal to its bit width is undefined, regardless of whether the operand is signed or unsigned. In theory, this means that the result of such a shift is not guaranteed and may vary across different implementations.
However, in practice, some compilers may implement a specific behavior in such cases. For example, GCC issues a warning when the shift count exceeds the type width, but does not raise an error. This behavior is not explicitly defined in the C standard and may vary across different platforms.
In the code snippet provided, a right shift of an unsigned integer by 34 is performed:
<code class="cpp">unsigned int val = 0x0FFFFFFF; unsigned int res = val >> 34;</code>
The result calculated according to the C standard should be 0, as the shift count is greater than the width of the unsigned int type (which is typically 32 bits). However, GCC gives a warning and calculates the result as 67108863 instead.
This discrepancy arises because GCC is implementing a specific behavior for this undefined case. The generated assembly code uses the SHRL instruction, which performs a logical right shift and does not sign-extend the result. As a result, the result is not zero but rather a non-zero value.
Therefore, when working with shift operations in C , it is crucial to ensure that the shift count does not exceed the width of the type being shifted. Exceeding the type width can lead to undefined behavior and unreliable results across different compilers and platforms.
The above is the detailed content of What Happens When You Shift Right with a Count Exceeding Type Width in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C destructorsarespecialmemberfunctionsthatautomaticallyreleaseresourceswhenanobjectgoesoutofscopeorisdeleted.1)Theyarecrucialformanagingmemory,filehandles,andnetworkconnections.2)Beginnersoftenneglectdefiningdestructorsfordynamicmemory,leadingtomemo
