


How does the C standard guarantee the order of member constructor and destructor calls in a class with member variables of other classes?
Nov 08, 2024 am 06:31 AMOrder of Member Constructor and Destructor Calls
Problem:
In C , when a class contains member variables of other classes, the order of their initialization and destruction is crucial. Consider the following program:
#include <iostream> using namespace std; struct A { A() { cout << "A::A" << endl; } ~A() { cout << "A::~" << endl; } }; struct B { B() { cout << "B::B" << endl; } ~B() { cout << "B::~" << endl; } }; struct C { C() { cout << "C::C" << endl; } ~C() { cout << "C::~" << endl; } }; struct Aggregate { A a; B b; C c; }; int main() { Aggregate a; return 0; }
Under the C standard, is it guaranteed that this program will always produce the following output:
A::A B::B C::C C::~ B::~ A::~
Answer:
Yes, it is guaranteed.
According to section 12.6.2 of the C standard, initialization and destruction of members within a class follow specific rules:
Initialization Order
- Virtual base classes (if any) are initialized first, depth-first, left-to-right.
- Direct base classes are initialized next, in declaration order.
- Non-static data members are initialized in declaration order, regardless of the order of member initialization.
- The constructor body is executed last.
Destruction Order
- Compound-statement of the destructor body is executed first.
- Non-static data members are destroyed in reverse declaration order.
- Direct base classes are destroyed in declaration order.
- Virtual base classes (if any) are destroyed last, in reverse depth-first, left-to-right order.
In the provided example, the members of the Aggregate struct are declared in the order a, b, and c. Therefore, it is guaranteed that they will be initialized in the order A::A, B::B, and C::C and destroyed in the reverse order C::~, B::~, and A::~.
The above is the detailed content of How does the C standard guarantee the order of member constructor and destructor calls in a class with member variables of other classes?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
