


Does GCC Allow Non-Constexpr Standard Library Functions in Constexpr Contexts?
Nov 29, 2024 pm 08:03 PMCan Non-Constexpr Standard Library Functions Be Treated as Constexpr in GCC?
GCC compiles code that initializes static constexpr variables with non-constexpr standard library functions without issuing warnings, such as the functions in the example below:
#include <cmath> struct foo { static constexpr double a = std::cos(3.); static constexpr double c = std::exp(3.); static constexpr double d = std::log(3.); static constexpr double e1 = std::asin(1.); static constexpr double h = std::sqrt(.1); static constexpr double p = std::pow(1.3,-0.75); };
According to the C 11 and C 14 standards, non-constexpr functions cannot be used in constant expressions. However, GCC treats some built-in standard library functions as constexpr, even though they are not explicitly marked as such.
This behavior is a non-conforming extension in C 14. The draft C 14 standard prohibits implementations from declaring standard library function signatures as constexpr unless explicitly required.
In C 11, the consensus shifted from allowing this extension to prohibiting it. This is because different implementations treating functions differently could lead to divergence in behavior when using SFINAE.
GCC initially relied on an earlier proposed resolution of LWG issue 2013, which allowed implementations to declare any function as constexpr if it satisfied certain constraints. This is why GCC treats these functions as constexpr in strict conformance mode.
However, the resolution changed in C 14, and this extension is now considered non-conforming. GCC is expected to address this issue and either issue warnings or disable this behavior in strict conformance mode.
Note that compiler intrinsics are not covered by this issue, so using them in constexpr contexts should be allowed.
The above is the detailed content of Does GCC Allow Non-Constexpr Standard Library Functions in Constexpr Contexts?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
