


How Can `static_cast` Seemingly Allow Access to a Derived Class\'s Members When Downcasting a Base Pointer to a Distinct Base Object?
Nov 30, 2024 am 10:35 AMDowncasting Using the static_cast Operator: Demystifying Undefined Behavior
Consider the following concern:
class base { base(); virtual void func(); }; class derived : public base { derived(); void func(); void func_d(); int a; }; int main() { base *b = new base(); sizeof(*b); // Gives 4. derived *d = static_cast<derived*>(b); sizeof(*d); // Gives 8 - means whole derived obj size...why? d->func_d(); }
In this scenario, casting the base pointer to a derived pointer using static_cast has seemingly allowed access to the full derived object's size and function. However, this raises the question: how is this possible if the base pointer originally pointed to a distinct base object?
Understanding the Undefined Behavior
The answer lies in the nature of static_cast and its impact on dynamic objects. Downcasting using static_cast to a type that the object does not actually have is classified as undefined behavior. The consequences of undefined behavior can vary dramatically, including allowing unexpected access to the derived class member function func_d() in this case.
The Rule of Downcasting
According to the C standard (section 5.2.9), downcasting using static_cast follows a specific rule:
- If the base pointer points to a base object that is a subobject of a derived object, then the resulting derived pointer will point to the enclosing derived object.
- Otherwise, the result of the cast is undefined.
In our example:
- The base pointer points to a base object that is distinct from any derived object.
- Therefore, the downcast to derived* results in undefined behavior.
The unexpected success of calling d->func_d() is a consequence of this undefined behavior. Do not rely on the ability to access derived class members after an unsafe downcast.
The above is the detailed content of How Can `static_cast` Seemingly Allow Access to a Derived Class\'s Members When Downcasting a Base Pointer to a Distinct Base Object?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
