Is Atomic Read-Modify-Write a Single Operation or Two in C ?
Dec 05, 2024 am 02:13 AMAtomic Read-Modify-Write: A Single Operation or Two?
For synchronization purposes, atomic read-modify-write (RMW) operations like x.exchange(..., std::memory_order_acq_rel) raise questions regarding their treatment. Are they considered a single operation or two separate operations?
Standard's Perspective
The C standard regards RMW operations as singular entities. This is evident from their naming and implicit in various related language.
Synchronization Implications
In your example:
x.exchange(1, std::memory_order_acq_rel); // Line A y.store(1, std::memory_order_relaxed); // Line B
- Line B does not have a matching release or stronger store, making it effectively y.store(1, std::memory_order_relaxed).
- Line A has only a matching load, making its "acquire" part redundant. It can be viewed as x.store(1, std::memory_order_release).
Consequently, the code is reduced to:
x.store(1, std::memory_order_release); y.store(1, std::memory_order_relaxed);
Since there are no operations between these stores and the corresponding loads in the other thread, the synchronization is effectively disabled. This allows for the possibility of printing 0, 1.
ARM64 Implementation and Implication
ARM64's implementation of x.exchange() raises concerns. However, upon closer examination, it is evident that the implementation aligns with the standard's perspective on a singular RMW operation. The ordering sequence guarantees that the last read value in the RMW is consistent with the write.
Incorrect cppreference Quote
The quoted text from cppreference is inaccurate. RMW operations in C are treated as single operations, and reordering of other operations before or after them is prohibited.
The above is the detailed content of Is Atomic Read-Modify-Write a Single Operation or Two in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
