Subtyping Standard Containers: A Cautionary Tale
It has been a common topic of discussion on Stack Overflow whether inheriting from standard containers is a sound practice. While the concern has been raised that standard containers lack virtual destructors, this article aims to delve deeper into the reasons why subtyping standard containers should generally be avoided.
Perils of Lacking Virtual Destructors
The absence of virtual destructors in standard containers poses a serious challenge for polymorphic usage. Without virtual destructors, there is no guarantee that cleanup will be performed correctly in derived classes, leading to potential memory leaks and undefined behavior.
Design Flaws of Inheriting Containers
Even if virtual destructors were present, inheriting from containers still constitutes poor design. Instead of extending functionality through inheritance, it is preferable to use generic algorithms that work across all containers. This approach promotes code reuse and maintainability.
Inheriting from containers also compromises encapsulation. By breaking encapsulation, it becomes difficult to modify or maintain the internal workings of the container. Instead, it is better to keep the container's interface separate and introduce new behavior through external code, such as namespace-scope functions or containment in a new class.
Inheritance as a Misguided Means
Lastly, it is crucial to dispel the notion that inheritance is a suitable mechanism for extending behavior. This misconception has led to monolithic designs that are prone to rigidity and versioning issues.
Instead of inheriting to extend behavior, it is advisable to favor composable designs that allow components to be combined and recombined flexibly. Inheritance should primarily be used to enforce the Open/Closed Principle, where classes are open for extension but closed for modification.
In summary, inheriting from standard containers should be treated with caution. Lack of virtual destructors, design deficiencies, and the pitfalls of using inheritance for behavior extension all point to the superiority of alternative approaches, such as generic algorithms, composable designs, and the Open/Closed Principle.
The above is the detailed content of Should You Inherit from Standard Containers?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C destructorsarespecialmemberfunctionsthatautomaticallyreleaseresourceswhenanobjectgoesoutofscopeorisdeleted.1)Theyarecrucialformanagingmemory,filehandles,andnetworkconnections.2)Beginnersoftenneglectdefiningdestructorsfordynamicmemory,leadingtomemo
