


What's the Fastest Way to Determine if the Square Root of an Integer is an Integer?
Dec 18, 2024 pm 08:28 PMThe fastest way to determine whether the square root of an integer is an integer
Problem Description
I am looking for the fastest way Method to determine whether a long integer is a perfect square (i.e. its square root is another integer):
- I did it using the built-in Math.sqrt() function, but I'm curious if there is a way to do it using integer fields , thereby increasing the speed.
- It is impractical to maintain a lookup table (since there are approximately 231.5 integers whose squares are less than 263).
Here is the very simple and straightforward way I do it now:
{<br> if (n < 0)</p><pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false">return false;
long tst = (long)(Math.sqrt(n) 0.5);
return tst*tst == n;
}
Note: I use this function in many Project Euler problems. Therefore, there will not be any maintenance on this code in the future. And this micro-optimization can actually make a difference, because part of the challenge is taking less than a minute to complete each algorithm, whereas this function needs to be called millions of times in some problems.
I have tried different solutions to this problem:
- After exhaustive testing, I found that adding 0.5 to the result of Math.sqrt() is unnecessary, at least on my machine.
- Fast inverse square root is faster than Math.sqrt() but gives incorrect results for n >= 410881. However, as BobbyShaftoe suggested, we can use the FISR hack for n
- Newton's method is much slower than Math.sqrt(). This is probably because Math.sqrt() uses something similar to Newton's method, but is implemented in hardware and therefore much faster than in Java. Additionally, the Newton method still requires the use of double-precision floating point numbers. positive 64-bit signed integer), and it is slower than Math.sqrt().
- Binary search is even slower. This makes sense, since a binary search requires an average of 16 passes to find the square root of a 64-bit number.
- According to John's testing, using an or statement is faster than using a switch in C, but in Java and C# there seems to be no difference between an or and a switch.
- I also tried making a lookup table (as a private static array of 64 booleans). Then, instead of using a switch or or statement, I would just say if(lookup[(int)(n&0x3F)]) { test } else return false;. To my surprise, this is (slightly) slower. This is because array bounds are checked in Java.
The above is the detailed content of What's the Fastest Way to Determine if the Square Root of an Integer is an Integer?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The difference between HashMap and Hashtable is mainly reflected in thread safety, null value support and performance. 1. In terms of thread safety, Hashtable is thread-safe, and its methods are mostly synchronous methods, while HashMap does not perform synchronization processing, which is not thread-safe; 2. In terms of null value support, HashMap allows one null key and multiple null values, while Hashtable does not allow null keys or values, otherwise a NullPointerException will be thrown; 3. In terms of performance, HashMap is more efficient because there is no synchronization mechanism, and Hashtable has a low locking performance for each operation. It is recommended to use ConcurrentHashMap instead.

Java uses wrapper classes because basic data types cannot directly participate in object-oriented operations, and object forms are often required in actual needs; 1. Collection classes can only store objects, such as Lists use automatic boxing to store numerical values; 2. Generics do not support basic types, and packaging classes must be used as type parameters; 3. Packaging classes can represent null values ??to distinguish unset or missing data; 4. Packaging classes provide practical methods such as string conversion to facilitate data parsing and processing, so in scenarios where these characteristics are needed, packaging classes are indispensable.

The JIT compiler optimizes code through four methods: method inline, hot spot detection and compilation, type speculation and devirtualization, and redundant operation elimination. 1. Method inline reduces call overhead and inserts frequently called small methods directly into the call; 2. Hot spot detection and high-frequency code execution and centrally optimize it to save resources; 3. Type speculation collects runtime type information to achieve devirtualization calls, improving efficiency; 4. Redundant operations eliminate useless calculations and inspections based on operational data deletion, enhancing performance.

StaticmethodsininterfaceswereintroducedinJava8toallowutilityfunctionswithintheinterfaceitself.BeforeJava8,suchfunctionsrequiredseparatehelperclasses,leadingtodisorganizedcode.Now,staticmethodsprovidethreekeybenefits:1)theyenableutilitymethodsdirectly

Instance initialization blocks are used in Java to run initialization logic when creating objects, which are executed before the constructor. It is suitable for scenarios where multiple constructors share initialization code, complex field initialization, or anonymous class initialization scenarios. Unlike static initialization blocks, it is executed every time it is instantiated, while static initialization blocks only run once when the class is loaded.

InJava,thefinalkeywordpreventsavariable’svaluefrombeingchangedafterassignment,butitsbehaviordiffersforprimitivesandobjectreferences.Forprimitivevariables,finalmakesthevalueconstant,asinfinalintMAX_SPEED=100;wherereassignmentcausesanerror.Forobjectref

Factory mode is used to encapsulate object creation logic, making the code more flexible, easy to maintain, and loosely coupled. The core answer is: by centrally managing object creation logic, hiding implementation details, and supporting the creation of multiple related objects. The specific description is as follows: the factory mode handes object creation to a special factory class or method for processing, avoiding the use of newClass() directly; it is suitable for scenarios where multiple types of related objects are created, creation logic may change, and implementation details need to be hidden; for example, in the payment processor, Stripe, PayPal and other instances are created through factories; its implementation includes the object returned by the factory class based on input parameters, and all objects realize a common interface; common variants include simple factories, factory methods and abstract factories, which are suitable for different complexities.

There are two types of conversion: implicit and explicit. 1. Implicit conversion occurs automatically, such as converting int to double; 2. Explicit conversion requires manual operation, such as using (int)myDouble. A case where type conversion is required includes processing user input, mathematical operations, or passing different types of values ??between functions. Issues that need to be noted are: turning floating-point numbers into integers will truncate the fractional part, turning large types into small types may lead to data loss, and some languages ??do not allow direct conversion of specific types. A proper understanding of language conversion rules helps avoid errors.
