


How Can AVX2 and BMI2 Be Used for Efficient Left Packing Based on a Dynamic Mask?
Dec 20, 2024 am 01:49 AMEfficiently Packing Left Elements Based on a Mask with AVX2 and BMI2
In AVX2, achieving efficient left packing requires utilizing specific instructions and techniques. One approach is to leverage both AVX2's vpermps (_mm256_permutevar8x32_ps) for lane-crossing variable shuffling and BMI2's pext (Parallel Bits Extract) for bitwise operations.
Leveraging BMI2 for Mask Generation
BMI2's pext instruction enables the extraction of specific bits from a bitmask, providing a mechanism for dynamically generating lane-crossing shuffle control data on the fly. This eliminates the need for a large pre-computed look-up table (LUT).
The Algorithm
The algorithm involves:
- Extracting Compressed Indices: Using pext, a compressed bitmask is generated, containing the desired lane indices in the lower bits of an integer register.
- Unpacking Packed Indices: To unpack the compressed indices, a sequence of shifts and multiplications is employed. This step effectively replicates each bit to fill its corresponding byte, creating a per-byte index mask.
- Generating the Shuffle Mask: A shuffle mask is computed using the per-byte index mask. This mask is then used to control the lane-crossing variable shuffle operation using vpermps.
Performance Considerations
The advantage of this approach lies in its ability to generate the lane-crossing shuffle mask on the fly, avoiding the creation and storage of a large LUT. This approach could be advantageous in situations where the mask input is dynamic. However, it's important to note that pdep/pext operations can be relatively slow on AMD CPUs prior to Zen 3, so alternative methods like 128-bit vectors orLUT-based approaches may be more suitable for such architectures.
The above is the detailed content of How Can AVX2 and BMI2 Be Used for Efficient Left Packing Based on a Dynamic Mask?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
