Is `delete ptr` Equivalent to `delete[] ptr` for Dynamic Arrays in C ?
Dec 21, 2024 am 12:42 AMIs Operator Delete Equivalent to Operator Delete[]?
The behavior of deleting a dynamic array using either delete ptr or delete[] ptr in C has been a subject of confusion. Let's delve into the nuances and potential consequences to understand the proper usage.
When you allocate an array dynamically using new IP_ADAPTER_INFO[100], a contiguous block of memory is allocated, and a pointer ptr is returned pointing to the first element.
Using delete ptr:
- This is incorrect for an array.
- It attempts to delete a single object, releasing the memory allocated for the first element only.
- The remaining elements in the array are still allocated and remain in memory.
- This can lead to memory leaks and potential issues if accessed later.
Using delete[] ptr:
- This is the correct way to delete a dynamic array.
- It invokes the operator delete[] function, which is responsible for releasing the entire block of memory allocated for the array.
- All the elements in the array are deallocated, freeing up all the allocated memory.
Disassembly Code:
The provided disassembly code illustrates the difference between delete ptr and delete[] ptr.
- For delete ptr, only the first element's value is pushed onto the stack, and operator delete is called.
- For delete[] ptr, the array's address is pushed onto the stack, and operator delete[] is called, which deallocates the entire block of memory.
Undefined Behavior:
The question raises concerns about the consequences of using delete ptr for an array. The answer emphasizes that the result is undefined behavior.
- It could lead to unexpected crashes or memory corruption.
- The consequences can vary depending on the compiler, system configuration, and even seemingly unrelated factors.
- Relying on undefined behavior is strongly discouraged in any codebase.
The above is the detailed content of Is `delete ptr` Equivalent to `delete[] ptr` for Dynamic Arrays in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
