Explicit Template Instantiation: When is it Beneficial?
In the realm of C template programming, explicit template instantiation stands as a potent tool, albeit one that may seem enigmatic at first glance. This article aims to dispel any confusion and unveil the scenarios where explicit template instantiation proves its worth.
Explicit template instantiation involves explicitly specifying which instantiations of a template class should be compiled. This differs from implicit instantiation, where the compiler automatically instantiates templates as needed during compilation.
One compelling use case for explicit template instantiation is when a template class needs to be restricted to a limited set of types. Consider the following example:
template<typename T> class StringAdapter { // ... }; typedef StringAdapter<char> StrAdapter; typedef StringAdapter<wchar_t> WStrAdapter;
Here, we have defined a template class StringAdapter that can adapt strings of various types. To support both character and wide character strings, we create type aliases StrAdapter and WStrAdapter respectively.
However, we only want the template class to work with characters. By explicitly instantiating only the StringAdapter
// Explicitly instantiate only the desired instantiations template class StringAdapter<char>; template class StringAdapter<wchar_t>;
This explicit instantiation prevents the potential instantiation of StringAdapter for unintended types, enhancing code correctness and preventing unexpected behavior. It also offers performance benefits by reducing compile times and code bloat.
Another advantage of explicit template instantiation is when dealing with classes with member templates. In such cases, explicit instantiation can help ensure that the correct member templates are compiled for the desired types.
Overall, explicit template instantiation empowers developers to control template instantiation, restrict template functionality to specific types, and optimize compilation and execution. By understanding its benefits, programmers can harness this powerful feature to enhance their template-based designs.
The above is the detailed content of When is Explicit Template Instantiation Beneficial in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
