Is `delete` Equivalent to `delete[]` for Dynamic Arrays in C ?
Dec 26, 2024 pm 05:31 PMIs delete[] Equivalent to delete? An Exploration of Undefined Behavior
The question of whether using delete or delete[] when deallocating a dynamic array can lead to memory leaks has been a subject of debate among programmers. To delve into this topic, let's consider the disassembly code generated by Visual Studio 2005:
; delete ptr; 0041351D mov eax,dword ptr [ptr] 00413520 mov dword ptr [ebp-0ECh],eax 00413526 mov ecx,dword ptr [ebp-0ECh] 0041352C push ecx 0041352D call operator delete (4111DBh) 00413532 add esp,4 ; delete []ptr; 00413535 mov eax,dword ptr [ptr] 00413538 mov dword ptr [ebp-0E0h],eax 0041353E mov ecx,dword ptr [ebp-0E0h] 00413544 push ecx 00413545 call operator delete[] (4111E5h) 0041354A add esp,4
Comparing these two blocks of code reveals slight differences in their calls to operator delete and operator delete[]. These distinctions highlight the crucial question: is using delete on a dynamic array equivalent to using delete[]?
The answer to this question, unfortunately, falls under the umbrella of undefined behavior in C . Undefined behavior refers to situations where the behavior of the program is not specified by the language standard. Consequently, it might vary across compilers, compiler versions, and other factors.
Due to this inherent uncertainty, it is strongly advised to avoid using delete on arrays and strictly adhere to using delete[]. This approach ensures predictable behavior and prevents potential memory leaks or other unexpected consequences. In summary, while delete and delete[] may appear similar in certain scenarios, their subtle differences and the potential for undefined behavior demand that programmers use them with caution.
The above is the detailed content of Is `delete` Equivalent to `delete[]` for Dynamic Arrays in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
