


What Thread Executes Code After an `await` Keyword in a Multi-Threaded Application?
Dec 30, 2024 pm 10:48 PMUnraveling the Mystery of Threaded Execution After 'Await'
In a multi-threaded application, understanding the flow of execution is crucial. When encountering the enigmatic 'await' keyword, developers often grapple with the question: "Which thread orchestrates the resumption of code after the 'await'?"
Consider the following code snippet:
private void MyMethod() { Task task = MyAsyncMethod(); task.Wait(); } private async Task MyAsyncMethod() { //Code before await await MyOtherAsyncMethod(); //Code after await }
Assuming this code operates within a single-threaded application, it becomes perplexing: how can the code after the 'await' keyword execute if the thread is locked by 'task.Wait()'?
The answer lies in the sophisticated behavior of the 'await' keyword. It yields control back to the caller, allowing other asynchronous operations to proceed. The continuation of the 'awaiting' task (the code after the 'await') is scheduled to execute on a thread that conforms to the current synchronization context.
In this scenario, if the 'MyMethod()' function is executing on a UI thread, the code after the 'await' would also execute on the UI thread once 'MyOtherAsyncMethod()' completes.
However, it's important to note that the exact thread used for the continuation is not guaranteed. In multi-threaded applications, the continuation may execute on any available thread from the thread pool. However, the synchronization context ensures that the code after the 'await' is executed in a consistent manner with respect to the original thread.
In the given example, by calling 'task.Wait()', the main thread will be blocked indefinitely, preventing the continuation from ever executing. To avoid this, asynchronous operations should be properly awaited without blocking the main thread.
The above is the detailed content of What Thread Executes Code After an `await` Keyword in a Multi-Threaded Application?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
