


Why Does My Code Throw a TypeLoadException Even Though the Method Exists?
Jan 09, 2025 am 11:11 AMUnderstanding TypeLoadExceptions and Missing Implementations
Developers often encounter the frustrating TypeLoadException
: "Method 'SetShort' in type 'DummyItem' ... does not have an implementation," even when the method clearly exists. This article explores the root cause and solution.
The Puzzle:
The error message is misleading. The SetShort
method is present in the DummyItem
class. The confusion deepens when the calling code doesn't even use SetShort
.
The Solution: Clean Build and Assembly Versioning
Quick Fix: Delete all bin
and obj
folders in your solution and perform a full rebuild. This synchronizes assembly versions.
Detailed Explanation:
The problem stems from version mismatches between assemblies. This commonly happens when an interface (e.g., InterfaceDef
) is updated to include a new method (like SetShort
), but the implementing class (DummyItem
in Implementation
assembly) isn't recompiled with the updated interface. Even though SetShort
exists in DummyItem
, the runtime doesn't recognize the updated interface definition, leading to the exception. The crucial link between the interface and its implementation is broken.
Illustrative Example:
Imagine three projects:
-
InterfaceDef: Defines the interface containing
SetShort
. -
Implementation: Contains
DummyItem
, which implements the interface. -
ClientCode: Uses classes from
Implementation
.
If SetShort
is added to InterfaceDef
but Implementation
isn't rebuilt with the updated InterfaceDef
reference, running ClientCode
will trigger the TypeLoadException
when DummyItem
is instantiated.
Conclusion:
This TypeLoadException
highlights the importance of consistent assembly versions. A clean rebuild resolves version conflicts, ensuring that the runtime correctly links interfaces and their implementations. Thoroughly cleaning your build directories is crucial for preventing these subtle yet disruptive errors.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does My Code Throw a TypeLoadException Even Though the Method Exists?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C destructorsarespecialmemberfunctionsthatautomaticallyreleaseresourceswhenanobjectgoesoutofscopeorisdeleted.1)Theyarecrucialformanagingmemory,filehandles,andnetworkconnections.2)Beginnersoftenneglectdefiningdestructorsfordynamicmemory,leadingtomemo
