


Why is My Entity Framework Async Operation 10x Slower Than Its Synchronous Counterpart?
Jan 10, 2025 pm 06:46 PMEntity Framework Async: A Significant Performance Bottleneck
This article details a performance issue encountered while using Entity Framework's asynchronous methods. The author discovered a tenfold increase in execution time for asynchronous queries compared to their synchronous counterparts.
The Problem: Synchronous queries completed within seconds, while their asynchronous equivalents took ten times longer.
Debugging the Issue: SQL Server Profiler confirmed identical SQL queries for both synchronous and asynchronous calls. Further investigation revealed the culprit: the asynchronous operation spawned over two million tasks and incurred significant overhead.
Root Cause: The problem stemmed from a bug in Entity Framework 6's asynchronous implementation. When dealing with tables containing large binary columns, the framework should automatically utilize the CommandBehavior.SequentialAccess
flag in asynchronous calls. This crucial optimization was missing.
Resolution: The author suggests bypassing Entity Framework's built-in asynchronous methods. A workaround using TaskCompletionSource
allows for manual asynchronous execution, ensuring CommandBehavior.SequentialAccess
is applied correctly for tables with large binary data.
Key Observations:
- Ado.Net exhibits similar performance degradation with asynchronous operations on tables containing large binary columns and
CommandBehavior.Default
. - The performance difference was most noticeable with large binary columns (256 KB in the author's tests).
- CPU usage patterns were unusual: the synchronous operation used 12% CPU, while the asynchronous operation peaked at 20%, hinting at potential resource contention.
The above is the detailed content of Why is My Entity Framework Async Operation 10x Slower Than Its Synchronous Counterpart?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
