How to Achieve URL-Safe Base64 Encoding and Decoding in C#?
Jan 25, 2025 am 03:07 AM
When processing URL -based applications, the base64 encoding is critical to ensure data integrity and readability. In C#, the built -in Base64 encoding function provides a convenient way to convert binary data into text -based forms. However, it adds the characters ("==") to the coding string, which may cause problems when used in URL.
URL security encoding
In order to overcome this limit, the URL security encoding is deleted and filled characters, and the specific problem characters ("", "/", "=") are replaced with URL-friendly characters ("-", "_", "") Essence This ensures that the coding string can be transmitted to the URL parameter safely without causing any interpretation problems.
Unlike the CODEC library of Java, C#has no built -in URL security encoding function. However, you can achieve the same results through a few simple steps:
Use Execute the conventional base64 encoding.
- Use Delete the fill in the coding string.
-
Convert.ToBase64String()
Use to replace the problem character (for example, replace "" "- "and"/"to" _ "). -
TrimEnd()
Example -
Replace()
Note:
Inverse process
byte[] toEncodeAsBytes = System.Text.ASCIIEncoding.ASCII.GetBytes("StringToEncode"); string returnValue = System.Convert.ToBase64String(toEncodeAsBytes) .TrimEnd(new char[] {'='}).Replace('+', '-').Replace('/', '_');Decoding the string of the URL security code back to its original form, just reverse this process:
Replace URL -friendly characters with its original corresponding characters.
Fill the character string to multiple times with the '=' character if necessary. Use to convert the string back to binary data.
Example
- By combining these steps, you can effectively implement URL security codes in C#. It is important to test whether the commonly used code library is consistent with this implementation to ensure compatibility in scenarios that require interoperability.
The above is the detailed content of How to Achieve URL-Safe Base64 Encoding and Decoding in C#?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
