Regex Efficiency: d
vs. [0-9]
– A Surprising Comparison
A recent discussion sparked debate about the relative efficiency of d
and [0-9]
in regular expressions. Initial testing suggested d
was faster, but further investigation revealed a more nuanced reality: d
can be less efficient in specific scenarios. This article explores the reasons behind this discrepancy.
The key difference lies in the character sets each expression matches. [0-9]
strictly matches only the ASCII digits 0 through 9. d
, however, is broader; it encompasses all Unicode digits, including those from various non-Latin scripts (e.g., Persian, Devanagari).
This expanded matching range for d
can impact performance. The regex engine must evaluate a larger character set, potentially increasing processing time. While the difference might be negligible in many cases, the impact becomes more pronounced when dealing with large datasets or complex regex patterns.
The following code snippet illustrates the extensive character set matched by d
:
var sb = new StringBuilder(); for (UInt16 i = 0; i < 0x10FFFF; i++) { if (char.IsDigit((char)i)) { sb.Append((char)i); } } Console.WriteLine(sb.ToString());
This code iterates through all Unicode code points and appends only those classified as digits by char.IsDigit()
, effectively mirroring the behavior of d
. The resulting output is a comprehensive list of Unicode digits, highlighting the significantly larger character set compared to the ten digits matched by [0-9]
.
Therefore, while d
offers broader compatibility, [0-9]
provides potentially superior performance when dealing exclusively with ASCII digits. The choice between them should be guided by the specific needs of your application and the nature of the data being processed. If you are certain your input only contains ASCII digits, [0-9]
is likely the more efficient option.
The above is the detailed content of Is `\d` Less Efficient Than `[0-9]` in Regex?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
