Vanilla JavaScript loops vs. jQuery.each: A Performance Comparison
This article explores the performance differences between using vanilla JavaScript for
loops and jQuery's $.each
method for array iteration. We'll demonstrate that, for speed, vanilla for
loops, especially those with variable caching, significantly outperform $.each
. This can result in speed improvements of up to 84%, as shown in jsperf benchmarks (link omitted for brevity, but easily searchable).
jQuery.each Example:
$.each(myArray, function() { let currentElement = this; // ... your code using currentElement ... });
For Loop with Variable Caching (Fastest):
const len = myArray.length; for (let i = 0; i < len; i++) { let currentElement = myArray[i]; // ... your code using currentElement ... }
For Loop without Variable Caching:
for (let i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++) { let currentElement = myArray[i]; // ... your code using currentElement ... }
Pre-calculated Length Attempt: (Similar performance to the cached version)
let len = myArray.length; let i = 0; for (; i < len; i++) { let currentElement = myArray[i]; // ... your code using currentElement ... }
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):
While this article focuses on performance, here's a summary of key differences and considerations for choosing between $.each
and for
loops:
-
Functionality: jQuery's
$.each
iterates over arrays and objects, offering a concise syntax.for
loops provide more direct control over iteration. -
Performance:
for
loops (especially with variable caching) are generally faster due to reduced function call overhead. The difference becomes more pronounced with larger datasets. -
Readability:
$.each
can improve code readability for simple iterations.for
loops are more explicit. -
Breaking the Loop: Returning
false
from the$.each
callback breaks the loop.for
loops usebreak
. -
Index Access: Both provide access to the current index (though differently).
-
NodeList/HTMLCollection:
$.each
works with NodeLists and HTMLCollections, butthis
refers to a DOM element, not a jQuery object. Wrap with$(this)
to use jQuery methods. -
Native
forEach
: JavaScript's nativeforEach
offers similar syntax to$.each
but with potentially better performance than jQuery's implementation. -
Object Iteration: Both can iterate over objects.
-
Sparse Arrays:
$.each
skips undefined indices in sparse arrays, whilefor
loops include them. -
Chaining:
$.each
doesn't support chaining like other jQuery methods.
In summary, for optimal performance, especially when dealing with large datasets, prioritize vanilla JavaScript for
loops with variable caching. jQuery's $.each
is more convenient for smaller datasets or when readability is paramount. Consider JavaScript's native forEach
as a faster alternative to jQuery's $.each
.
The above is the detailed content of Speed Question jQuery.each vs. for loop. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Java and JavaScript are different programming languages, each suitable for different application scenarios. Java is used for large enterprise and mobile application development, while JavaScript is mainly used for web page development.

JavaScriptcommentsareessentialformaintaining,reading,andguidingcodeexecution.1)Single-linecommentsareusedforquickexplanations.2)Multi-linecommentsexplaincomplexlogicorprovidedetaileddocumentation.3)Inlinecommentsclarifyspecificpartsofcode.Bestpractic

The following points should be noted when processing dates and time in JavaScript: 1. There are many ways to create Date objects. It is recommended to use ISO format strings to ensure compatibility; 2. Get and set time information can be obtained and set methods, and note that the month starts from 0; 3. Manually formatting dates requires strings, and third-party libraries can also be used; 4. It is recommended to use libraries that support time zones, such as Luxon. Mastering these key points can effectively avoid common mistakes.

PlacingtagsatthebottomofablogpostorwebpageservespracticalpurposesforSEO,userexperience,anddesign.1.IthelpswithSEObyallowingsearchenginestoaccesskeyword-relevanttagswithoutclutteringthemaincontent.2.Itimprovesuserexperiencebykeepingthefocusonthearticl

JavaScriptispreferredforwebdevelopment,whileJavaisbetterforlarge-scalebackendsystemsandAndroidapps.1)JavaScriptexcelsincreatinginteractivewebexperienceswithitsdynamicnatureandDOMmanipulation.2)Javaoffersstrongtypingandobject-orientedfeatures,idealfor

Event capture and bubble are two stages of event propagation in DOM. Capture is from the top layer to the target element, and bubble is from the target element to the top layer. 1. Event capture is implemented by setting the useCapture parameter of addEventListener to true; 2. Event bubble is the default behavior, useCapture is set to false or omitted; 3. Event propagation can be used to prevent event propagation; 4. Event bubbling supports event delegation to improve dynamic content processing efficiency; 5. Capture can be used to intercept events in advance, such as logging or error processing. Understanding these two phases helps to accurately control the timing and how JavaScript responds to user operations.

JavaScripthassevenfundamentaldatatypes:number,string,boolean,undefined,null,object,andsymbol.1)Numbersuseadouble-precisionformat,usefulforwidevaluerangesbutbecautiouswithfloating-pointarithmetic.2)Stringsareimmutable,useefficientconcatenationmethodsf

If JavaScript applications load slowly and have poor performance, the problem is that the payload is too large. Solutions include: 1. Use code splitting (CodeSplitting), split the large bundle into multiple small files through React.lazy() or build tools, and load it as needed to reduce the first download; 2. Remove unused code (TreeShaking), use the ES6 module mechanism to clear "dead code" to ensure that the introduced libraries support this feature; 3. Compress and merge resource files, enable Gzip/Brotli and Terser to compress JS, reasonably merge files and optimize static resources; 4. Replace heavy-duty dependencies and choose lightweight libraries such as day.js and fetch
