

I'll find out whether this will make Ethereum reverse its decline? V God's major proposal: EVM replaces RISC-V!
May 15, 2025 am 11:24 AMAgainst the backdrop of Ethereum facing competition in other public chains and the setback of Layer2 strategy, co-founder Vitalik Buterin proposed a "bold reform": replacing the existing Ethereum virtual machine (EVM) with a RISC-V instruction set architecture, aiming to improve the efficiency of smart contract execution through a simpler and more general underlying system.
Vitalik makes a shocking proposal: Change EVM to RISC-V?
Vitalik posted a proposal at the Ethereum Magicians forum yesterday (20th), pointing out that Ethereum has been limited by execution layer bottlenecks in scaling and performance, especially when combined with ZK-EVM (zero-knowledge virtual machines), which proves too expensive. He argued that if the underlying language of smart contracts is converted from EVM to RISC-V, it will improve the speed of contract execution, simplify the system, and make it easier to expand in the future.
RISC-V is an open source streamlined instruction set architecture that is closer to the underlying language of traditional CPUs than the current Ethereum-specific virtual machine language, with a wider range of development tools and support environments. Vitalik says that most developers can still develop through languages ??such as Solidity or Vyper, just compile the backend to RISC-V.
RISC-V proves that efficiency is more than a hundred times
Vitalik quotes ZK-EVM's cycle data and points out that the four most resource-consuming steps of the execution layer include: input data decoding (deserialization), state verification (initialization of witness database), block execution and state root calculation, among which block execution and input data decoding are the most resource-consuming steps, and the two together account for more than half of the overall calculation.
Note: The so-called "cycle data" refers to the processing cycle consumed by each execution step when generating the ZK proof, and can be regarded as a quantitative indicator of resource consumption.
Taking the cycle count displayed in the chart as an example, different block types (such as blocks containing bn254 or bls12_381syscall), block execution alone accounts for 31% to 60% of the execution cost.
He pointed out that many ZK-EVMs have compiled EVM into RISC-V and then performed zero-knowledge proofs, so "let developers directly use RISC-V is actually more efficient."
Vitalik believes that if the contract is run directly on RISC-V, the overall ZK proves that it is not a dream to increase efficiency by more than 100 times. According to data provided by Vitalik, EVMs can be as efficient as 800 times slower than native RISC-V when performing intensive calculations such as Fibonacci.
EVM will not exit the stage immediately
It should be noted that Vitalik proposes not a one-time replacement, but supports the "dual VM coexistence" mode: EVM contracts and RISC-V contracts can coexist and call each other, and will not destroy the operation of existing smart contracts. In addition, he also proposed a further concept of "virtual machine interpreter", running traditional EVM contracts through interpreters written by RISC-V to achieve smooth transitions, further unify the underlying language and significantly simplify execution layer specifications.
He stressed that Ethereum has been making any slight simplification at the protocol layer in the past (such as removing SELFDESTRUCT). If we really want to create a long-term maintenance-simple execution layer, adopting RISC-V may be the only pragmatic way.
Ethereum processing fee hits a five-year low
As this proposal is released, the Ethereum mainnet is facing economic pressure. On-chain data shows that the average transaction fee of Ethereum dropped to US$0.16 in April, a new low since 2020, indicating that the demand for main network transactions has decreased significantly, and more and more users have turned to Layer2, resulting in the dilution of main chain revenue.
Ethereum (ETH) price also fell into a downturn, trading price fell to around $1,600. Many analysts warn that if the Ethereum main chain cannot restore its revenue and expansion advantages, ETH prices may continue to fall.
Can RISC-V help Ethereum turn the situation around?
Vitalik's proposal is not only a reform of the technology architecture, but may also become a turning point in Ethereum's rebuilding market confidence. When new generations of high-throughput public chains such as Solana and Sui attract developers and funds with a simpler monolithic architecture, if Ethereum can significantly improve execution efficiency without sacrificing security and decentralization, the competition threshold for L1 will be redefined.
Although this architectural change is still in the conceivable stage, if implemented, it will affect the development tool chain, node operation model and Layer2 integration strategy, and is one of the most systematic changes in Ethereum in the past decade.
The above is the detailed content of I'll find out whether this will make Ethereum reverse its decline? V God's major proposal: EVM replaces RISC-V!. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The role of Ethereum smart contract is to realize decentralized, automated and transparent protocol execution. Its core functions include: 1. As the core logic layer of DApp, it supports token issuance, DeFi, NFT and other functions; 2. Automatically execute contracts through code to reduce the risks of human intervention and fraud; 3. Build a DeFi ecosystem so that users can directly conduct financial operations such as lending and transactions; 4. Create and manage digital assets to ensure uniqueness and verifiability; 5. Improve the transparency and security of supply chain and identity verification; 6. Support DAO governance and realize decentralized decision-making.

To transfer USDT to the exchange for transactions, you must first confirm that the chain type matches, the address is correct, and complete real-name authentication. 1. Register and authenticate the mainstream exchange account with real name; 2. Confirm that the wallet is consistent with the USDT chain type of the exchange (such as TRC20); 3. Obtain the recharge address of the corresponding chain on the exchange and copy it accurately; 4. Initiate transfers from the wallet and pay the corresponding handling fee; 5. After arrival, you can trade in the spot or contract market; 6. Pay attention to checking the address, avoid transferring to the contract address, and give priority to low-processing networks. The entire process is usually completed in minutes, ensuring operational safety is key.

Whether an Ethereum perpetual contract is easy to do depends on multiple factors. 1. Its characteristics include no maturity date, capital fee mechanism and high leverage; 2. The advantages are high liquidity, moderate volatility, and support for a variety of strategies; 3. Challenges include high leverage and easy liquidation, capital fee rates affect returns, exchange risks and market manipulation risks; 4. Suitable for short-term traders, arbitragers and hedgeers, not suitable for inexperienced novices or people who cannot withstand high volatility; 5. To improve the success rate, you need to control leverage, set stop loss, pay attention to market sentiment and choose a reliable exchange. Overall, Ethereum perpetual contracts are suitable for experienced traders, but they need to be operated with caution.

The value of stablecoins is usually pegged to the US dollar 1:1, but it will fluctuate slightly due to factors such as market supply and demand, investor confidence and reserve assets. For example, USDT fell to $0.87 in 2018, and USDC fell to around $0.87 in 2023 due to the Silicon Valley banking crisis. The anchoring mechanism of stablecoins mainly includes: 1. fiat currency reserve type (such as USDT, USDC), which relies on the issuer's reserves; 2. cryptocurrency mortgage type (such as DAI), which maintains stability by over-collateralizing other cryptocurrencies; 3. Algorithmic stablecoins (such as UST), which relies on algorithms to adjust supply, but have higher risks. Common trading platforms recommendations include: 1. Binance, providing rich trading products and strong liquidity; 2. OKX,

USDT is not suitable as a traditional value-added asset investment, but can be used as an instrumental asset to participate in financial management. 1. The USDT price is anchored to the US dollar and does not have room for appreciation. It is mainly suitable for trading, payment and risk aversion; 2. Suitable for risk aversion investors, arbitrage traders and investors waiting for entry opportunities; 3. Stable returns can be obtained through DeFi pledge, CeFi currency deposit, liquidity provision, etc.; 4. Be wary of centralized risks, regulatory changes and counterfeit currency risks; 5. In summary, USDT is a good risk aversion and transitional asset. If you pursue stable returns, it should be combined with its use in financial management scenarios, rather than expecting its own appreciation.

USDC is safe. It is jointly issued by Circle and Coinbase. It is regulated by the US FinCEN. Its reserve assets are US dollar cash and US bonds. It is regularly audited independently, with high transparency. 1. USDC has strong compliance and is strictly regulated by the United States; 2. The reserve asset structure is clear, supported by cash and Treasury bonds; 3. The audit frequency is high and transparent; 4. It is widely accepted by institutions in many countries and is suitable for scenarios such as DeFi and compliant payments. In comparison, USDT is issued by Tether, with an offshore registration location, insufficient early disclosure, and reserves with low liquidity assets such as commercial paper. Although the circulation volume is large, the regulatory recognition is slightly low, and it is suitable for users who pay attention to liquidity. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be determined based on the purpose and preferences of use.

Ethereum transaction fees are determined by Gas consumption and Gas price, which are specifically affected by network congestion, transaction complexity and Gas Limit; EIP-1559 introduces a basic fee and priority fee mechanism, and users can set the highest fee and tip; the current handling fee is as low as 0.0001 ETH, up to 0.1 ETH; saving methods include selecting low peak periods, using the Layer 2 network and adjusting Gas price.

Is DAI suitable for long-term holding? The answer depends on individual needs and risk preferences. 1. DAI is a decentralized stablecoin, generated by excessive collateral for crypto assets, suitable for users who pursue censorship resistance and transparency; 2. Its stability is slightly inferior to USDC, and may experience slight deansal due to collateral fluctuations; 3. Applicable to lending, pledge and governance scenarios in the DeFi ecosystem; 4. Pay attention to the upgrade and governance risks of MakerDAO system. If you pursue high stability and compliance guarantees, it is recommended to choose USDC; if you attach importance to the concept of decentralization and actively participate in DeFi applications, DAI has long-term value. The combination of the two can also improve the security and flexibility of asset allocation.