The duration of the airdrop dividend is uncertain, but the LayerZero, StarkNet and ZK ecosystems still have long-term value. 1. LayerZero achieves cross-chain interoperability through lightweight protocols; 2. StarkNet provides efficient and low-cost Ethereum L2 expansion solutions based on ZK-STARKs technology; 3. ZK ecosystem (such as zkSync, Scroll, etc.) expands the application of zero-knowledge proof in scaling and privacy protection; 4. Participation methods include the use of bridging tools, interactive DApps, participating test networks, pledged assets, etc., aiming to experience the next generation of blockchain infrastructure in advance and strive for potential airdrop opportunities.

Ordinary investors can discover potential tokens by tracking "smart money", which are high-profit addresses, and paying attention to their trends can provide leading indicators. 1. Use tools such as Nansen and Arkham Intelligence to analyze the data on the chain to view the buying and holdings of smart money; 2. Use Dune Analytics to obtain community-created dashboards to monitor the flow of funds; 3. Follow platforms such as Lookonchain to obtain real-time intelligence. Recently, Cangming Money is planning to re-polize LRT track, DePIN project, modular ecosystem and RWA protocol. For example, a certain LRT protocol has obtained a large amount of early deposits, a certain DePIN project has been accumulated continuously, a certain game public chain has been supported by the industry treasury, and a certain RWA protocol has attracted institutions to enter.

The coordinated rise of Bitcoin, Chainlink and RWA marks the shift toward institutional narrative dominance in the crypto market. Bitcoin, as a macro hedging asset allocated by institutions, provides a stable foundation for the market; Chainlink has become a key bridge connecting the reality and the digital world through oracle and cross-chain technology; RWA provides a compliance path for traditional capital entry. The three jointly built a complete logical closed loop of institutional entry: 1) allocate BTC to stabilize the balance sheet; 2) expand on-chain asset management through RWA; 3) rely on Chainlink to build underlying infrastructure, indicating that the market has entered a new stage driven by real demand.

USDC is safe. It is jointly issued by Circle and Coinbase. It is regulated by the US FinCEN. Its reserve assets are US dollar cash and US bonds. It is regularly audited independently, with high transparency. 1. USDC has strong compliance and is strictly regulated by the United States; 2. The reserve asset structure is clear, supported by cash and Treasury bonds; 3. The audit frequency is high and transparent; 4. It is widely accepted by institutions in many countries and is suitable for scenarios such as DeFi and compliant payments. In comparison, USDT is issued by Tether, with an offshore registration location, insufficient early disclosure, and reserves with low liquidity assets such as commercial paper. Although the circulation volume is large, the regulatory recognition is slightly low, and it is suitable for users who pay attention to liquidity. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be determined based on the purpose and preferences of use.

PYUSD is not suitable as a speculative asset, but is suitable for payment and funding stability. 1.PYUSD is issued by PayPal, anchored to the US dollar, and has no appreciation potential; 2. It is suitable for short-term value preservation and avoiding crypto market fluctuations; 3. Currently supports Coinbase, Kraken, Binance US, Huobi and PayPal wallet transactions; 4. Compliance and security should be given priority when choosing a platform.

The value of stablecoins is usually pegged to the US dollar 1:1, but it will fluctuate slightly due to factors such as market supply and demand, investor confidence and reserve assets. For example, USDT fell to $0.87 in 2018, and USDC fell to around $0.87 in 2023 due to the Silicon Valley banking crisis. The anchoring mechanism of stablecoins mainly includes: 1. fiat currency reserve type (such as USDT, USDC), which relies on the issuer's reserves; 2. cryptocurrency mortgage type (such as DAI), which maintains stability by over-collateralizing other cryptocurrencies; 3. Algorithmic stablecoins (such as UST), which relies on algorithms to adjust supply, but have higher risks. Common trading platforms recommendations include: 1. Binance, providing rich trading products and strong liquidity; 2. OKX,

Security and personal needs should be given priority when choosing a Bitcoin trading platform. 1. Binance is a world-leading platform, providing rich trading pairs and low fees; 2. OKX has strong technical strength and supports multiple trading modes; 3. Gate.io currency selection is numerous and the community is active; 4. Huobi interface is simple and easy to use; 5. KuCoin focuses on user experience; 6. Kraken is highly compliant; 7. BITFINEX is suitable for professional traders; 8. Bitstamp is simple to operate. Each platform has its own advantages, and users need to choose according to their own situation.

The altcoin transfer fee varies from chain to chain and is mainly determined by the basic network fee, transaction speed and Gas unit. 1. The Ethereum fee is high, with an average of US$2~20 per transaction, suitable for high-value transactions; 2. The Binance Smart Chain fee is low, about US$0.1~0.3, suitable for daily operations; 3. The Solana fee is extremely low, usually below US$0.0001, suitable for high-frequency transactions; 4. The Polygon fee is less than US$0.01, compatible with EVM; 5. TRON focuses on low-cost, and the handling fee is almost negligible. Users should reasonably choose the transfer method based on the characteristics of the chain, network congestion and gas fluctuations, and at the same time confirm that the token belongs to the same link as the receiver to avoid asset losses.