


Failover and recovery mechanism in Nginx load balancing solution
Oct 15, 2023 am 11:14 AMFailover and recovery mechanism in Nginx load balancing solution
Introduction:
For high-load websites, the use of load balancing is to ensure high availability and One of the important means to improve performance. As a powerful open source web server, Nginx's load balancing function has been widely used. In load balancing, how to implement failover and recovery mechanisms is an important issue that needs to be considered. This article will introduce the failover and recovery mechanism in Nginx load balancing and give specific code examples.
1. Failover mechanism
Failover refers to the ability of the system to seamlessly transfer the load to other normal nodes when one or multiple nodes fail. Nginx provides a variety of failover mechanism configuration options. Here are some commonly used methods.
- Health check-based failover
Nginx’s upstream module provides a failover mechanism based on active health checks. By regularly sending health check requests to the backend server, the availability of the node can be judged and load balancing can be performed based on the check results. When a node fails, Nginx will automatically forward requests to other normal nodes to achieve failover.
The following is an example of a load balancing configuration based on health check:
upstream backend { server backend1.example.com:80; server backend2.example.com:80; check interval=3000 rise=2 fall=3 timeout=1000; } server { listen 80; server_name example.com; location / { proxy_pass http://backend; } }
In the above configuration, a health check request will be sent to the backend server every 3 seconds. When there are two consecutive normal responses, the node is considered to be back to normal; when there are three consecutive abnormal responses, the node is considered to be faulty. Nginx will perform load balancing based on node availability and automatically switch to normal nodes.
- Failover based on active detection
The stream module of Nginx provides a failover mechanism based on active detection. By periodically sending probe requests to the backend server, the availability of nodes can be detected and load balancing can be performed based on the probe results. When a node fails, Nginx will automatically forward the request to other normal nodes to achieve failover.
The following is an example of a load balancing configuration based on active detection:
stream { upstream backend { server backend1.example.com:80; server backend2.example.com:80; check interval=3000 rise=2 fall=3 timeout=1000; } server { listen 80; proxy_pass backend; } }
In the above configuration, a detection request will be sent to the backend server every 3 seconds. When there are two consecutive normal responses, the node is considered to be back to normal; when there are three consecutive abnormal responses, the node is considered to be faulty. Nginx will perform load balancing based on node availability and automatically switch to normal nodes.
2. Failure recovery mechanism
Failure recovery refers to the ability of the system to automatically redistribute the load to the node after a node failure is repaired. Nginx provides a variety of configuration options for failure recovery mechanisms. Here are some commonly used methods.
- Failure recovery based on health check
Nginx’s upstream module also provides a failure recovery mechanism based on active health check. After the node's availability is restored, Nginx will automatically redistribute requests to the node.
The following is an example of a health check-based failure recovery configuration:
upstream backend { server backend1.example.com:80; server backend2.example.com:80; check interval=3000 rise=2 fall=3 timeout=1000; } server { listen 80; server_name example.com; location / { proxy_pass http://backend; } }
In the above configuration, when the availability of a node is restored, Nginx will automatically redistribute requests to the node.
- Weight-based failure recovery
Nginx’s upstream module also provides a weight-based failure recovery mechanism. By setting different weight values ??for nodes, you can control the load distribution ratio. When the availability of a node is restored, the weight value of the node can be adjusted to gradually return it to normal load status.
The following is an example of a weight-based fault recovery configuration:
upstream backend { server backend1.example.com:80 weight=5; server backend2.example.com:80 weight=1; } server { listen 80; server_name example.com; location / { proxy_pass http://backend; } }
In the above configuration, the weight of the backend server backend1 is 5, and the weight of the backend server backend2 is 1. When the availability of backend1 is restored, its weight value can be adjusted so that it gradually returns to 5 to achieve failure recovery.
Conclusion:
This article introduces the failover and recovery mechanism in the Nginx load balancing solution and gives specific code examples. By properly configuring failover and recovery mechanisms, system availability and performance can be improved. In actual applications, the appropriate configuration method can be selected according to specific needs and scenarios to achieve the optimal load balancing effect.
The above is the detailed content of Failover and recovery mechanism in Nginx load balancing solution. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Docker container startup steps: Pull the container image: Run "docker pull [mirror name]". Create a container: Use "docker create [options] [mirror name] [commands and parameters]". Start the container: Execute "docker start [Container name or ID]". Check container status: Verify that the container is running with "docker ps".

You can query the Docker container name by following the steps: List all containers (docker ps). Filter the container list (using the grep command). Gets the container name (located in the "NAMES" column).

Create a container in Docker: 1. Pull the image: docker pull [mirror name] 2. Create a container: docker run [Options] [mirror name] [Command] 3. Start the container: docker start [Container name]

NGINX and Apache have their own advantages and disadvantages and are suitable for different scenarios. 1.NGINX is suitable for high concurrency and low resource consumption scenarios. 2. Apache is suitable for scenarios where complex configurations and rich modules are required. By comparing their core features, performance differences, and best practices, you can help you choose the server software that best suits your needs.

Practical Tips for Improving PhpStorm Performance in CentOS Systems This article provides a variety of methods to help you optimize the performance of PhpStorm in CentOS systems and thus improve development efficiency. Before implementing any optimization measures, be sure to back up important data and verify the results in the test environment. 1. System-level optimization and streamline system services: Disable unnecessary system services and daemons to reduce system resource usage. Interfaceless Mode: Switching to interfaceless mode can significantly save resources if you do not need a graphical interface. Uninstall redundant software: Remove software packages and services that are no longer in use and free up system resources. 2. PHP configuration optimization enable OPcache: install and configure OPcache extensions to display

NGINX and Apache are both powerful web servers, each with unique advantages and disadvantages in terms of performance, scalability and efficiency. 1) NGINX performs well when handling static content and reverse proxying, suitable for high concurrency scenarios. 2) Apache performs better when processing dynamic content and is suitable for projects that require rich module support. The selection of a server should be decided based on project requirements and scenarios.

NGINX is more suitable for handling high concurrent connections, while Apache is more suitable for scenarios where complex configurations and module extensions are required. 1.NGINX is known for its high performance and low resource consumption, and is suitable for high concurrency. 2.Apache is known for its stability and rich module extensions, which are suitable for complex configuration needs.

NGINX and Apache each have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice should be based on specific needs. 1.NGINX is suitable for high concurrency scenarios because of its asynchronous non-blocking architecture. 2. Apache is suitable for low-concurrency scenarios that require complex configurations, because of its modular design.
