


Object type parameter compatibility problem in PHP interface: How to solve the 'must be compatible with' error?
Apr 01, 2025 am 11:06 AMIn-depth discussion on the compatibility issues of PHP interface and object type
In PHP development, interfaces are an important tool for defining code structures and behaviors. However, in interface method parameter type declarations, type compatibility issues are often encountered, resulting in "must be compatible with" errors. This article will analyze this error in detail and provide effective solutions.
Problem scenario:
Suppose we define an interface IAdminController
where the parameter type of the save
method is declared as object
:
interface IAdminController { function save(object $request): array; // ... other methods }
In the implementation class, the parameter type of the save
method is AdminRequest
:
class AdminController implements IAdminController { function save(AdminRequest $request): array { // ... method implementation } }
When running the code, you may get the " AdminRequest
must be compatible with object
" error, even if gettype($adminRequest)
returns object
.
Analysis of the root cause of the problem:
The key to the error is that the parameter type of the save
method in the interface IAdminController
is declared as object
. Although AdminRequest
is an instance of object
type, PHP has very strict requirements on matching object
types in type checking implemented by interfaces. In PHP 7.1 and previous versions, when object
is used as a parameter type, the specific object type passed in must exactly match object
. Although AdminRequest
is an object, it is not object
itself. Although PHP 7.2 and above are more relaxed in parameter hints for object
type, this is not the core of the problem.
The root cause lies in the strictness of type matching. The interface defines a contract that the implementation class must be accurately abide by. As a parameter type, object
is too broad to ensure the specific behavior and properties of the passed object.
Solution:
To solve this problem and avoid using too broad object
types, we can adopt the following better practices:
Use more specific type tips: If all
xxxRequest
classes inherit from the same base class (such as Laravel'sRequest
class), you can modify the parameter type of the interfacesave
method to that base class.Create a more specific interface: Create an interface (such as
IRequest
) and let allxxxRequest
classes implement the interface. Then, declare thesave
method parameter type ofIAdminController
interface asIRequest
. This method not only ensures type safety, but also avoids the ambiguity ofobject
types.
Best Practices:
It is not recommended to use object
as the interface method parameter type directly because it limits the flexibility of the interface and easily leads to type compatibility issues. Selecting the appropriate parameter type according to actual needs, such as using the base class or custom interface provided by the framework, can effectively avoid such errors and improve the maintainability and readability of the code.
Through the above analysis and solutions, you can better understand the compatibility issues of object
type parameters in the PHP interface and write more robust and easier to maintain PHP code.
The above is the detailed content of Object type parameter compatibility problem in PHP interface: How to solve the 'must be compatible with' error?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The duration of the airdrop dividend is uncertain, but the LayerZero, StarkNet and ZK ecosystems still have long-term value. 1. LayerZero achieves cross-chain interoperability through lightweight protocols; 2. StarkNet provides efficient and low-cost Ethereum L2 expansion solutions based on ZK-STARKs technology; 3. ZK ecosystem (such as zkSync, Scroll, etc.) expands the application of zero-knowledge proof in scaling and privacy protection; 4. Participation methods include the use of bridging tools, interactive DApps, participating test networks, pledged assets, etc., aiming to experience the next generation of blockchain infrastructure in advance and strive for potential airdrop opportunities.

Ordinary investors can discover potential tokens by tracking "smart money", which are high-profit addresses, and paying attention to their trends can provide leading indicators. 1. Use tools such as Nansen and Arkham Intelligence to analyze the data on the chain to view the buying and holdings of smart money; 2. Use Dune Analytics to obtain community-created dashboards to monitor the flow of funds; 3. Follow platforms such as Lookonchain to obtain real-time intelligence. Recently, Cangming Money is planning to re-polize LRT track, DePIN project, modular ecosystem and RWA protocol. For example, a certain LRT protocol has obtained a large amount of early deposits, a certain DePIN project has been accumulated continuously, a certain game public chain has been supported by the industry treasury, and a certain RWA protocol has attracted institutions to enter.

The coordinated rise of Bitcoin, Chainlink and RWA marks the shift toward institutional narrative dominance in the crypto market. Bitcoin, as a macro hedging asset allocated by institutions, provides a stable foundation for the market; Chainlink has become a key bridge connecting the reality and the digital world through oracle and cross-chain technology; RWA provides a compliance path for traditional capital entry. The three jointly built a complete logical closed loop of institutional entry: 1) allocate BTC to stabilize the balance sheet; 2) expand on-chain asset management through RWA; 3) rely on Chainlink to build underlying infrastructure, indicating that the market has entered a new stage driven by real demand.

The value of stablecoins is usually pegged to the US dollar 1:1, but it will fluctuate slightly due to factors such as market supply and demand, investor confidence and reserve assets. For example, USDT fell to $0.87 in 2018, and USDC fell to around $0.87 in 2023 due to the Silicon Valley banking crisis. The anchoring mechanism of stablecoins mainly includes: 1. fiat currency reserve type (such as USDT, USDC), which relies on the issuer's reserves; 2. cryptocurrency mortgage type (such as DAI), which maintains stability by over-collateralizing other cryptocurrencies; 3. Algorithmic stablecoins (such as UST), which relies on algorithms to adjust supply, but have higher risks. Common trading platforms recommendations include: 1. Binance, providing rich trading products and strong liquidity; 2. OKX,

Security and personal needs should be given priority when choosing a Bitcoin trading platform. 1. Binance is a world-leading platform, providing rich trading pairs and low fees; 2. OKX has strong technical strength and supports multiple trading modes; 3. Gate.io currency selection is numerous and the community is active; 4. Huobi interface is simple and easy to use; 5. KuCoin focuses on user experience; 6. Kraken is highly compliant; 7. BITFINEX is suitable for professional traders; 8. Bitstamp is simple to operate. Each platform has its own advantages, and users need to choose according to their own situation.

To check the real-time price of altcoins, it is recommended to use the exchange market page, market aggregation website and professional market APP. Specific methods include: 1. View real-time prices and trends through mainstream exchanges (such as Binance, OKX, Huobi); 2. Use market aggregation websites (such as CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko) to obtain authoritative and comprehensive data; 3. Use professional APP for personalized monitoring and chart analysis. It is recommended to combine multi-platform data, use chart tools to analyze trends, set price reminders, and give priority to highly-known platforms to ensure accurate and timely data.

PYUSD is not suitable as a speculative asset, but is suitable for payment and funding stability. 1.PYUSD is issued by PayPal, anchored to the US dollar, and has no appreciation potential; 2. It is suitable for short-term value preservation and avoiding crypto market fluctuations; 3. Currently supports Coinbase, Kraken, Binance US, Huobi and PayPal wallet transactions; 4. Compliance and security should be given priority when choosing a platform.

USDC is safe. It is jointly issued by Circle and Coinbase. It is regulated by the US FinCEN. Its reserve assets are US dollar cash and US bonds. It is regularly audited independently, with high transparency. 1. USDC has strong compliance and is strictly regulated by the United States; 2. The reserve asset structure is clear, supported by cash and Treasury bonds; 3. The audit frequency is high and transparent; 4. It is widely accepted by institutions in many countries and is suitable for scenarios such as DeFi and compliant payments. In comparison, USDT is issued by Tether, with an offshore registration location, insufficient early disclosure, and reserves with low liquidity assets such as commercial paper. Although the circulation volume is large, the regulatory recognition is slightly low, and it is suitable for users who pay attention to liquidity. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be determined based on the purpose and preferences of use.
