


Is Treating Non-constexpr Standard Library Functions as `constexpr` Conforming to the C Standard?
Dec 03, 2024 pm 07:32 PMTreating Non-constexpr Standard Library Functions as Constexpr: A Conformance Analysis
The question arises whether a compiler extension that treats non-constexpr standard library functions as constexpr is conforming. Despite the permissiveness of the C 11 draft standard, which suggested such treatment could be allowed, subsequent developments have clarified the matter.
C 14 Explicit Proscription
In C 14, the draft standard section 17.6.5.6 explicitly states that implementations must not declare any standard library function signature as constexpr unless explicitly required. This ruling precludes the conforming treatment of non-constexpr standard library functions as constexpr.
GCC Extension
GCC has implemented an extension that treats certain built-in functions as constexpr. However, this extension is considered non-conforming based on the updated C 14 standard.
As-if Rule and Observable Behavior
It was initially unclear if the as-if rule permitted treating non-constexpr functions as constexpr. The as-if rule allows implementations to deviate from the standard's requirements as long as they produce equivalent observable behavior. However, altering the constexpr status of functions affects observable behavior, as demonstrated by SFINAE tests, which would behave differently when using identical code.
Conforming Mitigation
To make the GCC extension conforming, the compiler would need to issue warnings in strict conformance mode (e.g., -std=c 11 -pedantic) when non-constexpr standard library functions are used in constexpr contexts.
Intrinsics Exception
Compiler intrinsics are not covered by the standard and may be exempt from the constexpr function rule. Using built-in intrinsics (e.g., __builtin_cos) as constexpr could potentially be allowed.
The above is the detailed content of Is Treating Non-constexpr Standard Library Functions as `constexpr` Conforming to the C Standard?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
