使用ID進(jìn)行樣式設(shè)計(jì)存在三大問(wèn)題：首先ID選擇器過(guò)于具體導(dǎo)致難以覆蓋；其次ID無(wú)法復(fù)用迫使代碼重復(fù)或結(jié)構(gòu)妥協(xié)；最后現(xiàn)代開(kāi)發(fā)已有更優(yōu)替代方案。ID的高特異性使樣式修改困難，易引發(fā)冗余代碼和!important濫用；HTML中ID唯一性的限制阻礙樣式復(fù)用，而類選擇器則天然支持多元素復(fù)用；當(dāng)前可用工具如BEM、CSS-in-JS及Tailwind等提供更強(qiáng)靈活性與可維護(hù)性。盡管ID在錨點(diǎn)鏈接或JavaScript定位中有用，但應(yīng)避免用于樣式設(shè)計(jì)以確保CSS的可擴(kuò)展性與一致性。

Using IDs for styling might seem straightforward at first, but it can lead to some real headaches down the line. The main issue is that IDs are too specific and rigid for most styling needs. While they get the job done in simple cases, they tend to cause more problems than they solve in larger or more complex projects.

ID Selectors Are Overly Specific

One of the biggest downsides of using IDs in CSS is their high specificity. An ID selector like #header has a much higher priority than classes or element selectors. This means if you try to override styles later—say with a theme or responsive layout—you’ll find yourself fighting against your own code.

• You may end up writing even more specific selectors just to make changes.
• It becomes tempting to use !important, which leads to messy, hard-to-maintain code.

Instead of relying on IDs, using class-based selectors gives you more flexibility and makes your CSS easier to manage.

IDs Can't Be Reused

HTML IDs are meant to be unique per page. That’s great for JavaScript hooks or anchor links, but not so great for styling. If you define a style using an ID, you can’t apply it to multiple elements without duplicating code or changing your markup.

For example:

• You want two buttons that look the same.
• One uses #submit-button, the other needs the same look but isn’t a submit button.

Suddenly, you either write duplicate styles or change how you structure your HTML just for styling purposes. Classes avoid this problem entirely by design.

Better Alternatives Exist

In modern web development, we have better tools for organizing styles:

• Classes let you reuse styles freely and combine them in different ways.
• BEM or similar naming methodologies help keep your class names meaningful without conflicts.
• CSS-in-JS solutions or utility-first frameworks like Tailwind take reusability even further.

IDs still have their place—for things like fragment identifiers or JavaScript targeting—but styling shouldn’t be one of them.

Avoiding IDs for styling might feel like a small detail, but it helps keep your CSS scalable, predictable, and easier to work with over time. Not a flashy rule, but a solid one.

以上是為什么避免使用ID進(jìn)行樣式是一個(gè)好習(xí)慣？的詳細(xì)內(nèi)容。更多信息請(qǐng)關(guān)注PHP中文網(wǎng)其他相關(guān)文章！