SOLID principle is five design principles to improve code maintainability and scalability in object-oriented programming. They are: 1. The single responsibility principle (SRP) requires that the class only assumes one responsibility, such as separating report generation from email sending; 2. The opening and closing principle (OCP) emphasizes that the extension is supported through interfaces or abstract classes without modifying the original code, such as using the IShape interface to realize area calculation of different graphics; 3. The Richter replacement principle (LSP) requires that the subclass can replace the parent class without destroying logic, such as Square should not mistakenly inherit Rectangle, resulting in abnormal behavior; 4. The interface isolation principle (ISP) advocates defining fine-grained interfaces, such as split printing and scanning functions to avoid redundant dependencies; 5. The dependency inversion principle (DIP) advocates relying on abstract rather than concrete implementation, such as decoupling order processing and payment methods through the IPaymentProcessor interface.

Sure! The SOLID principles are five design principles intended to make software designs more understandable, flexible, and maintainable. They're especially useful in object-oriented programming, like in C#. Let's break them down with simple explanations and practical examples of how they apply in C#.

Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)

A class should have only one reason to change — meaning it should do one thing and do it well.

Why it matters:
When a class handles multiple tasks, changes in one area can unexpectedly affect others. By separating concerns, your code becomes easier to test, debug, and extend.

Example in C#:
Say you have a ReportGenerator that creates reports and also sends emails. If email logic changes, you have to modify the same class that handles report generation — violating SRP. Instead, split these into two classes: ReportGenerator and EmailService .

 public class ReportGenerator {
    public string GenerateReport() {
        // Logic to generate report
        return "Report Content";
    }
}

public class EmailService {
    public void SendEmail(string content) {
        // Logic to send email
    }
}

Open/Closed Principle (OCP)

Software entities (classes, modules, functions) should be open for extension but closed for modification.

How to use it in C#:
Use interfaces or abstract classes so you can add new behavior without changing existing code.

Example:
Suppose you have a shape drawer app that supports different shapes. Instead of modifying a method every time you add a new shape, define an interface:

 public interface IShape {
    double Area();
}

public class Rectangle : IShape {
    public double Width { get; set; }
    public double Height { get; set; }
    public double Area() => Width * Height;
}

public class Circle : IShape {
    public double Radius { get; set; }
    public double Area() => Math.PI * Radius * Radius;
}

Now you can create new shapes without touching the drawing logic.

Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)

Objects of a superclass should be replaced with objects of its subclasses without breaking the application.

What this means in practice:
If you're using inheritance, derived classes should behave like their base class. Otherwise, substituting them could cause bugs.

Red flag example:
Imagine a Square class inheriting from Rectangle . If setting Width and Height independently breaks the square's definition, then Square isn't a proper substitute for Rectangle , violating LSP.

To fix this, rethink the inheritance structure or avoid forcing relationships that don't align with expected behavior.

Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)

Clients shouldn't be forced to depend on interfaces they don't use.

In C#, think about:
Instead of having one big interface with many methods, split them into smaller, more specific ones. That way, a class only needs to implement what it actually uses.

Real-world case:
Say you have a machine interface that includes both printing and scanning features. Not all devices support both. So instead of:

 public interface IMachine {
    void Print();
    void Scan();
}

Split it:

 public interface IPrinter {
    void Print();
}

public interface IScanner {
    void Scan();
}

public class SimplePrinter : IPrinter {
    public void Print() { /* Can print */ }
}

This way, each class implements only what it needs.

Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)

High-level modules shouldn't depend on low-level modules. Both should depend on abstractions. Also, abstractions shouldn't depend on details — details should depend on abstractions.

How to apply in C#:
Use dependency injection and program against interfaces rather than concrete classes.

Example:
Instead of a high-level OrderProcessor directly instantiating a PaymentProcessor , inject an abstraction:

 public interface IPaymentProcessor {
    void ProcessPayment(decimal amount);
}

public class CreditCardProcessor : IPaymentProcessor {
    public void ProcessPayment(decimal amount) {
        // Handle credit card payment
    }
}

public class OrderProcessor {
    private readonly IPaymentProcessor _paymentProcessor;

    public OrderProcessor(IPaymentProcessor paymentProcessor) {
        _paymentProcessor = paymentProcessor;
    }

    public void Checkout(decimal amount) {
        _paymentProcessor.ProcessPayment(amount);
    }
}

This makes it easy to switch payment methods without rewriting the order system.

These principles aren't strict rules — they're guidelines to help write cleaner, more maintained code. Applying them thoughtfully in C# can lead to better architecture and fewer headaches later on.

The above is the detailed content of Can you explain the SOLID principles and their application in C# object-oriented design?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!